some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country. To what extend do you agree with this view?
Nowadays, people have been travelling more than before in order to visit various kinds of nature and culture. Meanwhile, there has been a controversial discussion among people about how these tourist attractions could be preserved not to be destroyed. One main theory is the opinion which visitors have been more responsible than local ones on this issue. However, I myself cannot totally agree with this statement, I am going to talk about my view of this topic.
To be honest, the fact which native people have been symbols of maintaining their historical places, cannot be denied. In other words, if local individuals have not been careful about their cultural places, there would be fewer expectations from foreigners to be cautious. For example, when a visitor has come to one country even though he or she has wanted to be a responsible tourist who wants to follow the rules, their mind could be changed by seeing some native people who have not been careful about retaining their national resources or places. As a result, tourists might behave like others and not do their duty.
On the other hand, tourists have been the most visitors of these historical attractions all around the world. Because citizens may have seen theirs just once but the high proportion of visitors are people who have come from another countries. Therefore, if some places or ecosystems were destroyed, the possibilities for foreigners and native people being guilty could not be equal. Additionally, a person who has been travelling around the world should follow the international rules for visiting other countries to know how to act in those places. Consequently, if a visitor does not pursue those sayings, they will be doing something illegal.
To conclude, both native people and tourists should be charged for maintaining all the cultural and international places. But in some ways, because the number of foreigners who have been visiting these places are more than others, the opinion which travelers have been more accused for that have had more followers including myself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-10 | sanjana rani | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | panizzf | 87 | view |
| 2020-02-06 | Ripon03 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | AlMightylord86 | 74 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sport Centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 83
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large numbers of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 78
- the first graph indicates the highest level of education of women in someland in 1945 and the other one gives information about the same topic but in 1955 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13274336283 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65196826317 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525073746313 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6516755899 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314038752462 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114583205139 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352935892897 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207641002202 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324434042605 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.