Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact', almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.
To state if any theory could be considered a 'fact', initially a hypothesis is made, and there is a lot of trial and error made, different methodologies used to check if the hypothesis is true. And yes, people do believe a lot of scientific theories before they are proven to be true, either because the information is all about a new invention, or discovery, and obviously anything new is always fascinating.
But once they are proven to be True, and factual, there might be few other scenarios that the scientist might not have considered, which could negate the so-called fact to be a false statement. For example, a lot of people commonly believe that there are some aliens, or UFOs that are outside the earth, but till-date there is no concrete proof to validate such statements. But there were some scientific theories stating that there are some unknown vibrations which are being recorded and speculations are that there exists some lives outside the earth.Just like the humans existing on the earth, there might be other species living on different planets or different universe. But before we believe all that information we must be aware that these are just some observations made, and not some proven facts, thus we must consume this information with certain amount of skepticism and cynicism.
Further more, the statement also states that the information described as 'factual' may be proven false or wrong in the future, this could be a certain case, and many time scientist have experienced this.For example, for many years the scientist from all over the world believed that there were 9 planets in the Solar system,Pluto was considered that last planet, but in the recent years, because of its increasing distance, and other factor, its no longer considered a planet, instead its a moon that arbitrarily moving in some axis. These kind of statements which were for many years proven to be facts, and studied for many years could some day prove to be false. But that does not entirely mean that the methodologies used or the experiments employed by the scientist were wrong. There could be some gradual shift in the surroundings which makes the fact no longer true.
Additionally, I would like to emphasize that there should be certain skepticism in anything that we do, which will further bring about many new scenarios to consider, but totally not believing the facts that have been proven true will not help us at all. For many year, ages before, many people believed that the earth was flat, and they would strictly condemn people who would say otherwise. But years later, many scientists coming beyond that doubt have had the courage to prove them wrong. So i would like to underscore the statement that investing in new thoughts or possibilities that could pave way to new discoveries that could further help in the betterment of our lives.
There are multiple scenarios, were many scientist came forward, invested a lot of time and energy to prove something were small.But that could give us opportunity to prove something bigger.For example, in the recent time in India, the Chandrayan 2 mission, which was about gathering more information about the surface of Mars. And people all over India, had great hopes, and had great debates about the information it will collect, and the mission was made with lesser investments. But to people's dismay and disappointments, the mission was called unsuccessful because there was projectile which they estimated was displaced by the rocket, and because of some unforeseen scenarios.Thus there might be scenarios where people had high hopes, but we shouldn't be disappointed, instead learn from out mistakes and hope that the next time it be successful.
In conclusion, there might be many cases were the stated scientific theories which were proven to be true could later be negated, or concluded as wrong or false. But there is no harm in consuming the information described as 'factual'. The theories which have been proven wrong, should not be outcasted entirely, instead may be we consider the new information added and see if that will bring about a new possibility, instead of thinking it as a waste of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | Tabellini22 | 83 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | wootwoot | 66 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | bubble tea | 66 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | Tabassum Zaman | 58 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise the positive actions and ignore the negative ones 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of the Juniper Cafe a small local coffee shop in the downtown area of a small American city We must reduce overhead here at the cafe Instead of opening at 6 am weekdays we will now open at 8 am On week 68
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 53
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 85
- Scientific theories which most people consider as fact almost invariably prove to be inaccurate Thus one should look upon any information described as factual with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... because the information is all about a new invention, or discovery, and obviously anything n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Just
...ere exists some lives outside the earth.Just like the humans existing on the earth, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ny time scientist have experienced this.For example, for many years the scientist f...
^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Pluto
...there were 9 planets in the Solar system,Pluto was considered that last planet, but in...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... increasing distance, and other factor, its no longer considered a planet, instead ...
^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... no longer considered a planet, instead its a moon that arbitrarily moving in some ...
^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...n that arbitrarily moving in some axis. These kind of statements which were for many years...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'many years'.
Suggestion: many years
...roven true will not help us at all. For many year, ages before, many people believed that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 497, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...had the courage to prove them wrong. So i would like to underscore the statement ...
^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...nd energy to prove something were small.But that could give us opportunity to prove...
^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...s opportunity to prove something bigger.For example, in the recent time in India, t...
^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...nd because of some unforeseen scenarios.Thus there might be scenarios where people h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nd because of some unforeseen scenarios.Thus there might be scenarios where people h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 748, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ios where people had high hopes, but we shouldnt be disappointed, instead learn from out...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 837, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...mistakes and hope that the next time it be successful. In conclusion, there migh...
^^
Line 6, column 320, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...ould not be outcasted entirely, instead may be we consider the new information added a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 55.0 19.5258426966 282% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 40.0 14.8657303371 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 35.0 11.3162921348 309% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3484.0 2235.4752809 156% => OK
No of words: 699.0 442.535393258 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98426323319 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.14184870769 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70982908564 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412017167382 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1079.1 704.065955056 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 28.0 1.77640449438 1576% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.52985497 60.3974514979 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.2 118.986275619 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.95 23.4991977007 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 7.80617977528 205% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293485757627 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10305464932 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632246809972 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17857979691 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650313661941 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 14.1392134831 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.