Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
Because of the boom of technology, there is a multitude of technically advanced gadgets which can supersede traditional equipment, for example, computers. It has invariably been a controversial issue over whether public libraries preservation is worth investing money in since the rapid development of information technology. As far as I am concerned, I strongly support the belief that computers do wonders for reading, however, libraries are absolutely not a waste of money.
On the one hand, there is a tremendous variety of benefits given by computers to the public. An apparent merit is e-books are much more convenient compared to their paper counterpart. Numerous paper-based books consist of a considerable extent of knowledge, for instance, encyclopedia or novels. Hence, they are extremely heavy and difficult for the readers to carry, especially severals one at a time. Meanwhile, a large diversity of content on the Internet is stored online, including books. It follows naturally that the users can have an access to various genres of books they want to read simultaneously without having to carry all of them. Moreover, it is more time-saving when only with a search for titles on social network can readers acquire their desired books, incompation with manual searching in libraries. Secondly, the online books’ content maintenance is superior than traditional ones. An unequivocal rationale is e-books are not prone to hostile weather conditions such as drizzling rain or high temperature, thus, they are more secured. Books’ preservation may endure for a long time unless the information is eliminated by the uploaders on the Internet.
Nevertheless, I also advocate that libraries create a myriad of positive influences on our life that worth taking into account. What makes libraries stand out is their sentimental values. To be more specific, there are several irreplaceable properties only belong to traditional books such as the renowned authors’ autographs or books’ limited editions, especially of synonymous ones. Having those kinds of assets might promote people’s spiritual life by providing them with satisfactoriness in terms of emotions. Another obvious justification is reading paper books does not require Internet, therefore, the lack of Internet connection would not be a major hurdle. This would bring out more opportunities for participants who want to expand their horizon through reading. In other words, Internet shortage would not harm the prospects of healthy reading habit among people, especially socially disadvantaged citizens.
With all the justifications I mentioned above, I firmly comprehend the tremendous significance of technology in nurturing regular reading habit, while I also deem that public places for reading own a host of functions that can not be substituted by computers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | linh đan | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable and there are more beneficial ways to spend money Do you agree or disagree 60
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 86
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of those developments outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'libraries'' or 'library's'?
Suggestion: libraries'; library's
...controversial issue over whether public libraries preservation is worth investing money i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...llows naturally that the users can have an access to various genres of books they want to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 882, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
... books’ content maintenance is superior than traditional ones. An unequivocal ration...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 434.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57834101382 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1621240386 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 176.041082164 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608294930876 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0250392576 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148965086915 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403732855266 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052841648039 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102610950576 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646361375353 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 78.4519038076 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.