These days it is much easier for many people to travel to different countries for tourism than in the past.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Public concern has arisen about whether the improvement of tourism has led to huge benefits as it seems. From my perspective, despite some unexpected withdraws, traveling to other countries is certainly a significant step in human development.
The merits of traveling around the world are apparent. The fundamental factor that we need to take into consideration is the changes in how people widen their knowledge and social network. Specifically, they now stand a bigger chance to discover new cultures and concepts and as a result make up their mind on the surrounding environment. In the second place, unlimited access to a range of tourist destinations allows people to enjoy diverse forms of entertainment which cannot be adapted by a single leisure center. Moreover, they can now eliminate every geographical distance and sightsee a variety of scenery.
On the other hand, there is tempting to argue that foreign tourism is likely to cause numerous social issues. First of all, the expansion of traveling ability has led to the increase in tourist destinations all over the world. Plenty of locations such as religious and historical sites are now converted into places of interest and filled with commercial stalls. Consequently, the solemn atmosphere of them is destroyed and some traditional activities even become business that local people make a living from.
All things considered, I firmly believe that the positive points of foreign tourism clearly outbalance its negative effects. However, the government needs to implement effective strategies to develop tourism in a proper and suitable way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-21 | thaohienpt008 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | n.rajabi | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | Coheny | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-12 | doanthao2082003 | 81 | view |
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge an 78
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing gh What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, such as, as a result, first of all, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39920948617 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96600748376 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1112942966 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092418632114 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029853763937 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0208410620042 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546623246279 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128675879733 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.