For a long time art has been considered an essential parts of all cultures in the world. However, nowadays peoples values have changed, and we tend to consider science, technology and business more important than arts. What do you think are the causes of this? What can be done to draw peoples attention to art?
Art is an interesting skill to convey message, emotions and good things to people. There is no doubt that art has been lost its value and youth interest turn towards science, technology and business increases by leaps and bounds. This essay shall shed light on the reasons for the existence of this problem along with some ways to discuss the issue.
To begin with, there are various causes of considering other streams than arts. First of all, in the modern era, every work is done with the help of machines because it complete the work within minutes so arts lost its value. For instance, two decades ago drawing pictures of family and events are common and this work was done by specialist but today machine take the place of person in every place. Secondly, the most important factor is hard work. In art skills, person have to dedicate their time on specialist in one thing. Art waste the time and money of particular person. Other fields such as science and technology are considered as an essential because of huge profit.
On the other hand, there are umpteen solution to overcome this problem. The primary solution is that art subject should be mandatory in schools so that children recognise their talent at an early age and dedicate some time to art skills. Moreover, authorities also have the duty to offer seminars and free classes to young generation so that art do not lose its reputation. For example, government have to give loan to turn the attention of youth towards art.
In gist, I would like to assert that every problem has solution to deal with. Although, authorities have responsibility but as a good citizen society people also need to help government to overcome this difficulty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-25 | jaggi and anu | 73 | view |
- Store should sell local food products and not the imported food products Do you agree or disagree 56
- People nowadays work hard to buy more things This has made our life generally more comfortable but it is pity many traditional values have been lost on the way to such materialsm To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 84
- Older people often say life was better in the past than it is now Do you think it is right or wrong Give your reasons and relevant examples 92
- In many countries plastic containers have become more common than ever and are used by many food and drink companies Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 67
- The pie charts below show the averages household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'completes'?
Suggestion: completes
...ne with the help of machines because it complete the work within minutes so arts lost it...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'wastes'.
Suggestion: wastes
...ir time on specialist in one thing. Art waste the time and money of particular person...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83673469388 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44931970427 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9181834108 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279552619791 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846638690923 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452767319927 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147339683276 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568939973671 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.