The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing? Why is this? How could this be controlled?
Since industrial revolution was occurred, machines have improved to become one of the main vehicles for human’s transportation. During these years, because cars have been spreading much amount of fossil-fuel power to the air, lots of damages have happened to the earth’s atmosphere. Although many individuals have been aware of the adverse effects of their vehicles, they have still used them. This essay is going to talk about the reasons of this issue as well as the solutions.
To commence with, there have been several causes which has propelled the demand for usage of cars to be heightening. But one of the main ones that should not be overlooked, is the vehicles’ low prices. In fact, beneficial cars for the environment, which have been produced, have been more expensive than regular ones. For example, the first hybrid car, which has produced in 1990 in the United States, has been extremely luxurious that most of the people could not afford to buy. Moreover, another factor is the comfort of using the regular vehicles for individuals. Actually, people have chosen cars to be their major vehicles because they have been absolutely convenience and easy to use. On the other hand, hybrid cars have had more difficulties such as spending much amount of time to charge them with power. As a result, human’s tendency to select the easiest way for their issues has encouraged them not to buy hybrid ones.
Even though it has been absolutely difficult to stimulate human-beings to increase their demand for beneficial vehicles for the earth, there have been several solutions which could be taken in order to decline their damages. Based on the following reasons, these solution could be to not only make hybrid vehicles’ current prices to be lower, but also produce them in a way which could be easier to be used. For instance, generating these cars’ options not to be so complex in order to be comfort to follow by both young and old people. Consequently, by applying these solutions, the demand for this kinds of vehicles may be enlarged.
In conclusion, educating people to be aware of global warming and other horrible effects on the environment could not be enough to solve this difficulty. By recognizing the causes such as expensive costs of beneficial vehicles for environment, individuals have been more accurate to reduce the consequences of human’s activities and devices in their surroundings.
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- Every year several languages die out Some people think this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon 69
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 73
- Topic The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this solution' or 'these solutions'?
Suggestion: this solution; these solutions
...amages. Based on the following reasons, these solution could be to not only make hybrid vehicl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...pplying these solutions, the demand for this kinds of vehicles may be enlarged. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0925 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74939879792 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6696621963 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222500162143 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803886529018 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558326082354 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153306905039 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373585140437 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.