Today, TV channels provide man’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows, why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
It is undeniable that sports shows broadcast on TV channels are increasing significantly in number. However, the majority of these matches are for the male-dominated sports rather than female. From my perspective, this tendency resulted from several causes and I also believed that showtimes should be rescheduled with the aim of balancing time for women's sports
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations for the preference for man's sport over that of women. Among them, the underlying and also the most important reason may due to the fact that the plurality of spectators are men. Therefore, the vast majority of television programs, including sports performances, are often male-dominated sports which directly targeted male audiences as they gain much greater ratings when compared to sports with female players. In the second place, it is allegedly one of several consequences of the gender-stereotype. There seem to be shreds of evidence that women are universally misinterpreted not to indulge in sports and their sports competitions are often tiny in scale. An illustration of this is that the female-dominated sports competitions are not only inferior in terms of prize pool but also media campaign and number of participants
Nonetheless, despite all these pre-mentioned factors, I still support the idea of giving equal time for woman's sports shows. The first and foremost reason is that female-dominated sports have their own excitement and interesting points that, in some aspects, even outperformed the male-dominated ones. Female volleyball, which often outnumbered that of man in case of views, can be a perfect case to support this statement. Additionally, although several people many argue that time-sharing will cost broadcasters a great deal of money, it is unlikely to be true and, on the contrary, the television stations will achieve pretty profit from the new female audience.
To sum up, male-dominated sports often have more broadcasting time as most of the spectators are men and it also partly due to gender discrimination. Therefore, women's sports shows deserve more time on television as they have their own attractiveness
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | ngoc071003 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 89
- what are the causes and effects of traffic congestions? 78
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on as they have their own attractiveness
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, still, therefore, on the contrary, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42352941176 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27118593777 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1637138809 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.846153846 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414379009697 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148700878729 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110744051492 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267591531903 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091561128105 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.