Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Celebrities have always been receiving a great deal of media attention since the birth of this industry.Therefore the fact that celebrities' privacy is at stake is just one of many inevitable products of fame that have been long acknowledged.
In fact, instead of the accused unfair treatment towards famous people, the media is beneficial to them in various ways. First, they often get more attention from the public after being mentioned in the media. For example, movie stars like Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt gain more new followers, fans or anti-fan, everytime they appear in a TV show or have an article written about them, which expands their influences and eventually helps them earn more money from activities such as endorsement. Second, both parties, the celebrities and the media companies, receive their own benefits under this type of relationship. While these companies and newspapers are able to attract larger readership of people who are curious about the glamorous life of the celebrities, these stars can partly manipulate their images portrayed through articles, news and videos to the readers and audience.
Invasion of private life has been acknowledged as an inevitable part of celebrity life for a long time. In fact, most famous people are likely to understand clearly the risk of media influence when they choose to put their first step on this career path. In other words, if one cannot cope with the pressure from the media, such as being followed by hordes of paparazzi or libel from some gutter press, he or she should realistically consider other choices rather than the celebrity path. Furthermore, it is still possible for them to keep their private life off the limelight to some degree in case they do want that. For example, by choosing to avoid coming to famous restaurants or attractions where paparazzi often hang out, several stars are able to stay away from unnecessary trouble.
In conclusion, the two basic benefits, fame and wealth, of famous people are partly contributed by the media and it is safe to say that media influence is what they must learn to deal with as it is a natural part of this lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-30 | Kshee | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-30 | Kshee | view | |
| 2020-09-01 | secretboxielts | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | ngoctham4344 | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | ngoctham4344 | 73 | view |
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media Should they be given more privacy or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life 84
- Task 2 Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is it the case Who are more affected parents or children 89
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Task 2 Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Task 2 Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ention since the birth of this industry.Therefore the fact that celebrities privacy is at...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ention since the birth of this industry.Therefore the fact that celebrities privacy is at...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
...f this industry.Therefore the fact that celebrities privacy is at stake is just one of many...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 882, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and videos to the readers and audience. Invasion of private life has been acknow...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70362696492 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586111111111 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4724284634 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313937793734 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107624604691 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444130004977 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164007911568 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721060216511 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.