In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicylces, while in other cities riding bike is replacing cars. Why is this case?. Which development is better?
In this contemporary society, it is widely believed that people in many countries prefer riding bikes to driving cars. However, there are still other nations which see an opposite trend in the choice of transportation. There are several reasons why this common case happens, and my firm conviction is that traveling by bikes is much more beneficial.
On the other hand, many obivious factors can explain why modern generation inclines to use private car more. To begin with, employees can save a significant amount of time by riding cars. For instance, instead of waiting several hours for public transportation such as bus, train, people who ride cars can access to their workplace faster. Hence, this improvement not only helps aldults to reach the company on time, it also provides them with more time to allocate on their work’s performances. Moreover, governments in some countries do not provide sufficient quality for people to ride bicycles. In addition, if bicycle lane is not created enough, riders may find it risky to ride bikes on the main street. Consequenly, it is the scarcity in safety that many drivers hesitate to travel by bikes.
Despite these reasons described above, I still believe riding bikes is a more environmentally friendly plan that cyclists can receive many merits. Firstly, the more the people go to work by bikes, the less the pollution will emerge.While cars extremely emit a high amount of fossil fume and gas that degrade the air quality, riding bikes can significantly avoid this alarming problem. For example, by encouraging citizens to use bicycles on a daily basis, Da Nang city has recently seen a significant drop in a pollution’s rate. Secondly, bicycles is not only a mode of transport but it is also an effective kind of exercises. Many people nowadays believe that riding bicycles can significantly helps them to lose weights and keep fit, reducing many health-related issues such as diabetes or cholesterol.
Take everything into consideration, although private cars are beneficial in some aspects, driving bicycles can lead to more practical advantages which not only enhance the health’s condition but also bridge the pollution’ s rate.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-09-11 | quynhnhi280103 | 89 | view |
- 17 The diagram shows how recycled paper is made 78
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalilites and areas 78
- 31 The percentage and exact time weekly males and females spent on house tasks in 2010 of a country 89
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure This money should be used in new housing and road development Do you disagree or agree 84
- The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n with, employees can save a significant amount of time by riding cars. For insta...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...kes, the less the pollution will emerge.While cars extremely emit a high amount of fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20845070423 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90078757202 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597183098592 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7963818849 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5625 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238358635544 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713306509497 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437570347753 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143257670515 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383370338599 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.