The disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries are as great as the advantages. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries are as great as the advantages" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that tourism might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that tourism in less developed countries can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, the advantages of tourism in less developed countries can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that earning more income and prospering tourism are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of tourism in the financial status of poor countries. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both improving infrastructures and public transportation distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of culture science, without the slightest doubt, the disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of cultural problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the tourism industry can relate to the reality that the demerits of foreign passengers can pertain to producing new cultural events. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of ecotourism were correlated positively with preserving the environment, the local authorities would ultimately address the value of rituals. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of different types of tourism.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of tourism in less developed countries far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-20 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | ahmed0001 | 77 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Gohar Khan | 55 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Gohar Khan | 72 | view |
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
- The chart below shows the amount of spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you degree or disagree with this opinion 70
- You need to study climate change Which aspect of climate change will you choose and why Use examples 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86805555556 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33535095188 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0922558738 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.636363636 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330269017617 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117810709682 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105851050526 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196913966521 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635364576952 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.