University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern context, university admission based on gender has evolved into a major topic of concern. While it is claimed by some that accepting equal proportions of each gender in every college subject may do wonder, I believe that this measure should not be taken due to various reasons.
Having the same number of students of both sexes is advantageous in several respects. To begin with, it shuns the assumption of sexism. Many people may query about the reasons why some courses joust admit males to enroll in. Hereby, the allowance of men and women at equal rate possibly dispels this kind of question concerning gender discrimination. Additionally, gender balance in class contributes enormously to many tasks or activities. As an illustration, while men play a key role in joining sports competition, women are the primary source of cooking one. Without each other, they could not finish them with flying colors.
Nonetheless, the negativity that this method results in is greater, far outweighing the aforementioned benefits. First and foremost, it is almost improbable to fill courses with equal quantity of males and females. It is no secret that men dominate in certain subjects, and the same thing occurs to the weak sex. For instance, military course undoubtedly appeals to more male applicants, and it is unfeasible to fill them with 50 percent of females. Secondly, admission banking on gender is relatively unfair. The selection of applicants based on qualifications and tertiary scores should be strongly advocated. In this way, each gender will receive unbiassed opportunities to become a freshman. If a female student has good academic performance in the entrance exam, it is wrong to reject her in favor of a male one.
To recapitulate, personal strengths should be the chief foundation of opting for subjects. In opposition, admission depending on gender need eliminating from now on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | lee giang | 73 | view |
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 56
- Technology development leads to a lot of environmental issues Some people think that a simple lifestyle can preserve the environment while others argue that technology itself can solve it Discuss both sides and give your opinions 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21824104235 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96541477936 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641693811075 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.354872468 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3157894737 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158882249724 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370898998117 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496267016254 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902361093049 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546314013736 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.