It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit, but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "it is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit, but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that being a responsible visitor might be fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that historical places can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the culture standpoint, preserving both the culture and environment of the historical places can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that reading the history of societies and cultural sites are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between the culture and the environment. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both museums and old objects can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, not being a responsible tourist might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the self-esteem of people. Moreover, fundamental aspects of responsibilities can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of prestige can pertain to the background culture. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of personality patterns were correlated positively with education, the local authorities would ultimately address preserving the historical places. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the importance of history.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of the preservation of the culture and environment of the historical places far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-04 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-07-05 | Gohar Khan | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 59 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 89
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Support with examples or cases 88
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes Others however think that changes is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake Regardless of whether the course 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33522612927 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8459076237 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.909090909 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348328338859 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108895270835 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112988268066 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190617243336 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114264302518 0.0609392437508 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33522612927 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8459076237 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.909090909 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348328338859 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108895270835 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112988268066 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190617243336 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114264302518 0.0609392437508 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.