In some countries in Europe, some children from the age of 11 or 13 go to schools to learn more practical skills that will help them get a job. Other children stay in schools which provide a more general academic education.
What should schools do to prepare students for the world of work?
In recent years, schooling is the most necessary foundation. There are a few countries around Europe, schools are providing practical training classes with academic educations for gaining students’ life in the future. In contrast, others argue that schools should offer those children between 11 to 13 practical and proficient courses to help them build an excellent career. In my opinion, there are both advantages and disadvantages to this trend. Schools, in developing countries, which should prepare children to get suitable work after graduation.
Initially, technologies are changing frequently during recent decades. To face this matter, teenagers should be trained to suit these arduous circumstances from educations, otherwise, they will dispirit by facing the challenges at work in the future. For example, many children in Europe graduated are from years to years, yet they are questionable to get a job. This is because that they are lack of accepting and addressing encountering challenging situations.
Secondly, academic institutions should cooperate with companies or individual professionals to manage internship programmes for their students during summer periods. These internships not only offer a platform to develop practicals skills but also allow them to view life in a particular professional field. It also benefits the programme will not influence general education because it is happening during the summer vacations. For my friend as an example, his internship with a well-known company helped him to make decisions to follow higher education in computer science and information in order to fulfil his dream of becoming a software developer.
In a nutshell, we can strongly understand that have outstanding foundation students should focus on their education and avoid worrying about jobs after graduation. Therefore, teaching methods can try to introduce new techniques to prepare students for the world of work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-23 | oprah86 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | LE ANH HUY | 73 | view |
- These days it is easier than ever for people to travel to different places As a result many locations that used to be free of tourists have now become popular tourist destinations Do you feel this is a positive or negative development 64
- You are renting a flat from an agency Your contract was for one year but you need to leave the flat two months early Write a letter to the agency In your letter introduce yourself ask to leave the flat before the contract finishes explain why you need to 73
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
- Many modern films and television programs about past events and people contain a mixture of fact and fiction Some people say this distorts the public s view of history and should therefore be discouraged What are your views 87
- You arranged to visit a friend in Canada but an important event at home now means that you must change the dates of the visit Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain the important event apologise for the situation suggest a new arrangement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69863013699 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03990011046 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640410958904 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4430221995 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.933333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254594456565 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749068622161 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710711416794 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138679197323 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113101744465 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.