Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since Homo sapiens evolved to establish their territory on earth, they overpowered almost all the species that came in the way of their survival on earth. Currently there is a contentious argument over whether the money spent on preservation of wild animals is unreasonably high. I totally disagree with this statement and in the following essay I will discuss both the views and conclude why I disagree with this statement.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of logical reasons that prove that it is necessary to spend resources and money for preventing the extinction of rare species. Humans killed wild animals that could not be kept as pet, moreover, they also reared docile birds and animals for their own selfishness to eat their flesh. Already most of the rare species have gone extinct and if we fail to preserve the few species that are left then we are likely to disturb the balance of nature. This is certainly going to threaten our own survival on Earth. For example, the recent COVID-19 outbreak is a live example of playing with the laws of nature and disturbing the balance of nature by humans can prove to be fatal for us.
On the contrary, some people believe that too much money is spent on wildlife protection and instead this money can be utilized for research and development or for scientific endeavors such as Mars mission. However, I believe that while we try to find life on another planet it is more important to preserve the life on our planet Earth. Research and development is important but so is the survival of rare species as once extinct it cannot be reversed.
In conclusion, utilizing financial resources for the safety and survival of wildlife is necessary. They constitute an important part of the food chain and help in maintaining the balance of nature without which our own life could be endangered. Would humans ever understand these consequences? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 73
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Have you any 81
- In the modern era social networking sites such as Instagram Facebook and Snapchat have become an essential part of our lives However a lot of people think that these social networking sites have detrimental effect on society and people Do you agree or dis 89
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 78
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and f 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89570552147 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64609270751 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9496958628 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113592966527 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330111611822 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493127561719 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642960079403 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290286242058 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.