Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries.
Do you agree or disagree?
In this fast-changing world, the learning of children has become a debatable issue among people. While I accepted that learning domestic literature has some advantages, I think teachers should teach the literature of other countries as well.
Children should learn the literature of their own country because it has several merits. First, the literature of each country affects its culture and ritual directly and form children's characteristic. In fact, the religious beliefs of a nation are derived from country literature, and people choose poets to imitate them. Take Iran's literature having rich literature as an example. Iranian people extremely adhere to it due to its ethical quality that well-known poets such as Hafez and Saeidi have promoted. They stimulate people toward felicity, salvation and encourage people to establish well-mannered communication. In addition, the literature of a country could improve the insight of children about the history. For example, by studying literal books, like Shahname, the most Iranian ancient book, it is more likely that children get involved in the history of their own country.
Although teaching the literature of a country has some advantages, from my perspective, training children how are familiar with other countries' literature is more beneficial and instructive. On top of that, The literature of other countries makes chances for children and students to enhance their perception of the world and also expand people's awareness about the culture of world countries. Take Marcopolo, who has rounded the world, as an example. He traveled almost the whole world not only to explore adventures but also to investigate valuable experiences and increase his cognition. Furthermore, children might tend to migrate to other counties in the future; therefore, they should be acquainted with the destination literature in order to communicate more effectively.
For the reasons mentioned above, I think the benefits of teaching the literature of other counties outweigh the advantages of just teaching the literature of children country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | Afdalah Harris | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | levanhoan123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | deep Shikha | 92 | view |
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- Full time university students spend most of their time in class or working on assignments However some people think that it is important for students to get involved in non academic activities on campus as well for example to join a sports team or take pa 71
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ng children how are familiar with other countries literature is more beneficial and instr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in addition, in fact, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58620689655 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95490422973 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554858934169 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.917136106 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39601406366 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131437638955 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968416160757 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240594254421 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505819594064 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.