The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The maps illustrate the development of the waterfront area of a town called Darwin over 5 years from 2009.
Overall, the area experienced considerable changes during the period shown. The most noticeable difference between the two maps is The appearance of more trees and the expansion of housing area from 2009 to 2014.
During the 5-year period, the school and the convention center located in the northwest of the waterfront area remained unchanged. Similarly, the fishing area on the right top and the lake to the east of the center still existed. In 2014, the third swimming pool was constructed on the original site of the industrial site area next to the lake. The other two old pool still lied along the circular path in the roughly of the map.
Turning to the remaining features, we can see that more footpaths were built in 2014, two of which lead off the circular path to give access to a new university located in the south of Darwin and the other led to a new harbor along the seafront. Between 2009 and 2014, the large industrial area taking up the majority of the land from the middle to the bottom of Darwin was demolished to make way for more houses and trees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 84
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offenses are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph below shows trends in US meat poultry consumption 11
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62380952381 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47520584819 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9268600858 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282152358096 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118657369782 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935803819383 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199375415487 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918849930783 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.