Advance in science and technology and other areas of society in the last 100 years have transformed the way we live as well as postponing the day we die. There is no better time to be alive than now.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion.
Science and technology have played an indispensable role in our regular life for a long time. In the last decade, there has been an enormous advancement and development in each and every sector. One of the most positive points of it is long life compared to the past. I strongly agree that advancement in science has made our life longer and enjoyable ever. I would discuss this more in detail in the coming paragraph.
Firstly, nowadays we have vaccines and many medical facilities to fight jeopardizes disease within a matter of time. However, in the past, to cope up with a normal health-related issue used to take more than a week to find the root of it and cure it. The latest technology has changed our life totally and made life longer, healthier, and stronger than ever before. The Covid-19, for the instance, doctors and experts have done an excellent job to fight against the virus and found a vaccine, which has almost 99% effect on the covid virus, and it became possible with the help of advanced technology. Moreover, we, human beings, have had acquired solutions for rare and hard diseases, which were impossible to cure in the past.
In addition, the transportation and communication sectors have also contributed a lot to human lives. In the current situation, if someone is seriously injured at work or at home, could contact the nearest hospital and get there within a matter of time. Ambulance staff are responding quickly and also they start basic treatment while transporting the patient to the hospital so that chances to save lives get higher. The government also made some strict rules to support an ambulance that is carrying a patient in it. 100 years ago, there was no means of transportation to get the diseased person to the hospital or doctor to the patient's house. Because the development of the science sector made our lives longer than we have ever expected.
To wrap up, to get better technology, we have destroyed our environment in various ways, but it could be recovered or alternated by many other ways, which is negligible over an extended life. Before a decade, we had a dream to live 100 years and now it is possible, ever some people can live over 100 years, and it became possible only because of the dawn of science and technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-24 | Rehana Diwan | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-16 | Gourav Munjal | 61 | view |
| 2021-03-16 | Gourav Munjal | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-24 | AKNIC | 73 | view |
- The advance in air travel are focused only on first class and this seems to have left others with no benefits at all Do you agree or disagree 73
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial To what extend is globalization a positive or negative development 73
- In some cities the government has tried to reduce traffic For instance they imposed a congestion tax during rush hours Do you think this development is positive or negative Fossil fuels coal oil natural gas are the main sources in many countries but in so 78
- You have seen an advertisement in an English newspaper for a job working in the City Museum shop during the holidays You decide to apply for the job Write a letter to the director of the Museum In your letter introduce yourself explain what experience and 89
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment To wh 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore in detail in the coming paragraph. Firstly, nowadays we have vaccines and m...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 648, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...spital or doctor to the patients house. Because the development of the science sector m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79746835443 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68454005887 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536708860759 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1902452785 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.277777778 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217481030537 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627937528667 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050318668339 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130467568404 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367077804907 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.