Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet.
They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Unemployment is the paramount problem that governments all over the world are trying to overcome. Governments of many nations are instigating a lot of schemes for unemployed people to get over this problem. I believe that mobile phone provision with the internet is one of the best options to utilize the taxpayer’s funds is the popular opinion of many people.
The way of employment advertisements is changed drastically by technology by providing not as much stress for both the company and the jobseeker. Advertising in newspapers and employment weeklies is less exercise these days. Social websites like Linkedin, Indeed, and Naukati are performing their dominant roles present. Having uninterrupted internet enhances the chance of getting hired by the companies. Providing high-speed internet by the government is the greatest help to the job seekers, who cannot afford it, as of their financial situation.
Another Important revolution that has occurred is the method of Interview. Employer’s main inclination is on quick and easy techniques. Furthermore, many companies like to conduct their interviews online over Skype, Microsoft teams, rather than personal interviews. Moreover, they need a quick response with higher availability. A mobile phone is a great gadget for the jobseekers to appear for the interviews regardless of their place and time. Laptop and desktop may be the other options to give interviews, but mobile phones are portable and handier. Accordingly, these mobile phones make it possible for people to attend more interviews with less turnaround time and greater availability.
To sum up, both mobile phones and the internet play a vital role in the employment process. In my opinion, the government should spend some money to provide mobile phones with internet access to get rid of unemployment from their country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-20 | Nadish | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Prasanna Lakshmi | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Prasanna Lakshmi | 78 | view |
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have health problems as a result Why do so many working people not get enough exercise What can be done about this problem 73
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- television dominates the free time for too many people It can make people lazy and prevent them from socializing with others Do you agree or disagree Give a reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- Very few schoolchildren learn about the value of money and how to look after it yet this is a critical life skill that should be taught as part of the school curriculum Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment To what extent do 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther than personal interviews. Moreover, they need a quick response with higher a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, may, moreover, so, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44097222222 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00452775287 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7079207221 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1764705882 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252424932046 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686276550499 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672811839671 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15455328435 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797017832676 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.