Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in international tourism. Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the issue of tourism has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that global tourism exerts a positive influence on local society and should not be discouraged, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from a boom in tourism. Perhaps the principal advantage is that the tourism industry attracts investment from global businesses as well as governments, leading to economic growth. Another benefit is that developments in tourism can create numerous employment opportunities in the building of facilities and the updating of infrastructure, which often enables locals to have an improved standard of living. To be more specific, if it were not for tourism, there would be much higher unemployment rates in a myriad of well-known cities amongst overseas visitors, such as Paris and Venice considering that these cities' economies revolve around tourist spending. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the claim that the advancement of tourism benefits local society a great deal.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that a rise in tourism merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that the tertiary industry related to tourism often takes a heavy toll on the local environment. To exemplify, an article released by Seoul Times illustrates that one notable cultural heritage which had a multitude of species of birds in 2015. However, nearly 70% of them became extinct, and it turned out that the main reason for this phenomenon is that a huge amount of garbage generated by foreign travellers caused damage to the environment. Furthermore, a multitude of overseas tourists often commit vandalism, which makes residents in a local area have difficulty dwelling there. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- Q19 Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development Some people think that financial aid is important Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important Discuss both these 89
- Some people think living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the diadvantages 84
- Q2 Some people believe famous people s support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems while others think celebrities make the problems less important Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Q Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23218997361 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86124126359 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596306068602 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6601216229 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.647058824 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215714912469 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062795130167 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507819730872 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117933330901 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706050558077 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.