Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Developments in technology have dramatically changed the way we live. And some people think older technological advances had a bigger impact on our lives than recent developments. I partly agree with this statement, I believe advantages and impacts on people's lives depends on the particular area of technology.
There is no doubt that earlier technologies have been very influential in our lives, such as those related to technology around the home. Devices such as washing machines, televisions, microwaves and central heating were invented many years ago. And now almost everyone uses these to make their lives easier. Though there have been improvements in these devices, they still serve the same purpose as the time they were first invented.
Another example of this is medicine. Although there are many ground-breaking developments such as research into stem cells and genes, these do not affect average people at the moment. However, earlier advances in this area still have a great impact on our health. The ability to treat injuries, diseases and organ transplants helped many people and will for decades to come.
However, if we look at some more recent developments, they have had a much greater influence than in the past. Phones, for instance, are a significant development that helped many people. Although invented many years ago, technologic improvements changed phones from just a device to call people to the smart mini computer. People, nowadays, uses their phone for many everyday activities and to contact the world.
In conclusion, I would argue that some older technologies have benefits as well as some recent ones. The impacts on ordinary people's lives therefore depend on the type of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-26 | gigigns | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-03 | helloxjsky | 84 | view |
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Most modern families have both parents working and as a result children spend less and less time with their parents What is the reason for this What solutions can you suggest 56
- The internet has transformed how we interact and live in many great ways but also created problems that didn t exist before What are the problems and solutions 56
- It is certainly difficult for people in cities to do physical exercise Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'those technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; those technologies
... very influential in our lives, such as those technology related to the home. Devices such as wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...search into stem cells and genes, these dont affect average people at the moment. Ho...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29304029304 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8277866343 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586080586081 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.670663062 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233673401773 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710356620388 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574580205622 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131681888682 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625933634608 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.