Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a fast-changing world today, people attempt to give ideas to protect the environment, one of these is individuals are useless in the process of improving the environment merely governments as and big companies play a primary role. I totally disagree with this idea.
On the one hand, it is without controversy that the role of governments, as well as big entrepreneurs, is a significant one. Firstly, governments can have concrete policies to lead their citizens in the path of improving the environment. For example, since Earth Day was promoted by the Union of Nations, global citizens gradually had a significant cognition about the dramatic polluted problems. Secondly, large companies also play a dominant in this domain because every activity of them can change the environment around immediately and in such a numerous width area. Moreover, the results frequently take a long period of time to re-built. For example, an industrial company was criticized for polluting the primary flow of the Hong River in Vietnam and the pollution was extremely serious. Notwithstanding, the reality indicates that governments and large companies are merely a subordinate role, while individuals would be an important implication in this issue.
There are two primary arguments that prove the leading role of individuals. Firstly, governments, as well as huge entrepreneurs, are managed by individuals. This is the reason why individual knowledge is a crucial factor. For instance, many governments and companies prior to their benefits then attempt to industrialize and modernize and not only ignore but also cause harm to the environment. If the awareness of individuals is totally wrong, they will lead their citizens or workers in indirect ways. Secondly, the community is created by various individuals, so it is clearly a difference that can be made by enhancing awareness of individuals in changing the environment. For example, in recent years people are attempting more to attend in some activities such as collecting garbage and using environment- friendly products. This trend totally improves the natural circumstance.
In conclusion, individuals and also the larger scale of people as governments and companies should take more responsibility in protecting the environment. Individuals should be the foundation factor to improve our Earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 78
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ver, the results frequently take a long period of time to re-built. For example, an industria...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...foundation factor to improve our Earth.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4738292011 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2491101364 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548209366391 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5539427399 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.578947368 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200872336646 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574776769266 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04860004789 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12797424567 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00873430928229 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.