The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Given is a graph comparing the percentage of the people aged 65 and above in three different countries over a period of 100 years.
It is evident from the information supplied that the proportion of elderly people in overall three countries had increased from 1940 to 2020. Also noticeable is the fact that the percentage of those who aged 65 and above in the given countries will still rise in the next 20 years.
In 1940, the American elderly people accounted for almost 10% of the country’s population, whereas the figure for Sweden and Japan were nearly 7% and 5% separately. The year 1980 saw a similar increase in the population of American and Swedish elderly people, climbing by over 5% each. By contrast, Japan had seen a contrary trend during the same period.
The following 20-year period is expected to see the population of the elderly people soar sharply, especially in Japan, which figure will rocket by almost 17% of its population. A same trend will be seen in Sweden and America as well, whereas the change is not as dramatic as in Japan, by 8% separately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | nguyenhnil | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 the second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period 84
- Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63829787234 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53901204485 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505319148936 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 188.0 22.4926829268 836% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 872.0 112.824112599 773% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 188.0 22.9334400587 820% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 34.0 5.23603664747 649% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237637165044 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237637165044 0.103423049105 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165283336739 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103660438539 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 94.4 13.2329268293 713% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -110.88 61.2550243902 -181% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 75.4 10.3012195122 732% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.82 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.56 8.06136585366 193% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 77.2 10.9970731707 702% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.