the usage of great houses of Chaco canyon
The reading passage claims that the usage of great houses of Chaco canyon can be explained as residual purpose for three major important reasons; apartment building, storing food supplements and ceremonial center, however, the lecturer finds all of these ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the reading holds the idea that Chaco structures are clearly similar to recent Southwest societies apartments so it can be concluded that they are residential places. On the contrary, the lecturer opines that this similarity is just for the outside of the building but on the opposite side, the evidences of the inside part don't prove the idea. The lecturer believes that in residential theory, there should be more fire places for cooking of each family inside the houses, but there only around 10 so, the primary function can not be residency.
Moreover, the readding asserts that their function can be storing food supplements but on the other hand, the lecturer states that excavations don't support this idea as they couldn't trace containers and also there was no maze on the floor.
Finally, the reading brings this idea that one of the usages can be described as ceremonial center as some broken pots reveals gathering of a large number of people but on the opposite side, the lecturer declares that these broken pots can not support the idea of ceremony center, because they might be trash of construction tools that had been ran away or regular trash for meals.
To sum up, it is clear that the writer and the lecturer can not see each other in the same ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-23 | khush.furia | 60 | view |
| 2021-04-07 | linda0012 | 76 | view |
| 2020-09-19 | kohinoor | 76 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-26 | ilda | 73 | view |
- the usage of great houses of Chaco canyon 76
- Agree or disagree The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 76
- dinosarus are considered as endotherms or not 76
- Working for five days a week is compared with 4 days a week Reading declares three benefits of a four day week as for company the country as a whole and individual employee However the lecturer is on the opposite side 60
- According to the reading online encyclopedias have three major disadvantages 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
...idual purpose for three major important reasons apartment building storing food supplem...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e side the evidences of the inside part dont prove the idea The lecturer believes th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd the lecturer states that excavations dont support this idea as they couldnt trace...
^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...avations dont support this idea as they couldnt trace containers and also there was no ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s some broken pots reveals gathering of a large number of people but on the opposite side the lec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'run'.
Suggestion: run
...ash of construction tools that had been ran away or regular trash for meals To sum...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, moreover, so, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81090909091 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36337341195 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 275.0 21.2450331126 1294% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1323.0 110.228320801 1200% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 275.0 21.698381199 1267% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 109.0 7.06452816374 1543% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12161986795 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12161986795 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690015498227 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975580781568 0.0443174109184 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 138.7 13.3589403974 1038% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -199.19 53.8541721854 -370% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 109.4 11.0289183223 992% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.1 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.38 8.42419426049 242% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 10.7273730684 513% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 112.0 10.498013245 1067% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.2008830022 491% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.