The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, education or shopping.
To what extent do u agree or disagree?
Owing to increasing population gradually traffic congestion has become a pressing issue. This problem will only mitigate by reducing the necessity of the masses to travel from home for job, study and shopping purpose. In my opinion, I agree with this statement as people fulfil their needs by sitting at their home through online sources. However, it is not the only solution other steps are there to curb thee the traffic issue.
To commence with, it is obvious that because of travelling from one place to other for the sake of work such as work, education and buying things traffic is augmenting. First of all, people have various option but then also they commute for fulfilling their requirements. These days technology has improved a lot so people can do everything by sitting at their home. For example, they can work online, distance learning is possible nowadays also for shopping many apps are there. Therefore it is not requisite to go out for such things this can easily they can do from their homes.
Nevertheless, although with the help of technology people do the task from home. However, by doing this one can not dwindle the traffic issue. There are some other steps which they should take into consideration. First and foremost, Government involvement is required, they facilitate public transit which is not road-based. Public transport like sky trains and subways to reduce traffic. Another solution is government bodies should impose high prices of fuel so that people use fewer private vehicle. For instance nowadays in one family, all have their private vehicles so if fuel prices would be increase they limit the use of the vehicle. Finally, road infrastructure is also the biggest problem in some area due to which traffic jam arise so if this would improve that it is feasible to mitigate traffic congestion.
In recapitulation, it is true that by reducing the necessity for people to commute for work, learning, and shopping can reduce this problem but it will become the people introverted and less sociable. Therefore, to solve traffic issue other steps such as increasing fuel price, improve the infrastructure of road and use of public transportation is indispensable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-30 | mansipatel | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-30 | mansipatel | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canada provinces between 2001 and 2006 78
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do the disadvantage of this development for society outright the advantages 73
- These day young people leave school with negative attitudes towards learning why is this happening what can be done young people to leave school with more positive towards learning 84
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work education or shopping To what extent do u agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities with other people rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...or fulfilling their requirements. These days technology has improved a lot so people...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... also for shopping many apps are there. Therefore it is not requisite to go out for such ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08539944904 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72323211268 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501377410468 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3916253564 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1578947368 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292016610589 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912972827869 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748614761047 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197081106971 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464432981869 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.