The plans show changes to the layout of a theater between 2010 and 2012.
The given maps describe the changes of a theatre which experienced between 2010 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the size of the theatre in 2012 was larger than in 2010. Moreover, there was a new restaurant and a coordination room in 2012.
In 2010, there was a dressing room in the north of the theatre, with an adjacent storage room on the right side. However, the dressing room was relocated to a smaller one on the left side to make way for coordination room, while the storage was replaced by admin office in 2012. Besides, the stage became bigger in size, whereas showers area appeared the next.
On the south of the theatre in 2012, while storage room was built in the place of ticket office of the year 2010, this room occupied the location of cafeteria. In addition, a new restaurant sprang up in the middle of storage and ticket office. Nevertheless, the auditorium remain in the center of theatre.
- The table below gives information about UK independent films Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant https iotcdn os 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant https iotcdn os
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: bigger
...fice in 2012. Besides, the stage became bigger in size, whereas showers area appeared the next...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63190184049 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5108743886 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546012269939 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6322090388 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8888888889 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152001548021 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746956523212 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878901808934 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134436581741 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967071107505 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.