The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens’ health rather than on protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that the public authority should allocate more to clinical ventures instead of preserving our environment. However, I firmly accept that the government should also focus equally on saving our planet
On the first analysis, it is undoubted that medical research clearly contributes to the general improvement of the populace's wellbeing. Firstly, the first advantage of funding for clinical research is that it impacts human health enormously. Due to the appearance of significant increase of serious diseases: cancer, coronavirus,... which are lethal issues, conducting quality medical examinations should be funded to develop cures and precise diagnosis for illness. If it had not been for medical researches, humanity probably have faced and still struggled to combat various of infections that might actually cripple the well-being of human
On the other hand, spending money on the environment is a necessary part of protecting human health. We are facing many fatal diseases associated with the deterioration of the environment such as asthma and cancer. For instance, high levels of air and water contamination are leading to the increased number of cancer cases and deaths. The government can pass laws to protect the environment and enforce those laws. The government can adjust wastewater management by requiring industries to produce only acceptable amounts of specific toxic. The authorities could invest more in new-energy technologies to find better replacement to fossil fuels. This all allows people to reduce the air pollution on the Earth.
In conclusion, although medical research is certainly important and should be properly funded, I disagree that it should receive more money from the government than environmental protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-22 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | thanhtu000 | 80 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | Henry14 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | immtee | 84 | view |
- The bar chart describes the sales of different goods in pounds in the UK over four seasons in 2015 87
- The graph shows the percentage of people who use mobile phones in four situations grouped by four age groups 80
- Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sports people are too high while others argue that sports salaries are fair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is often argued that the public authority should allocat...
^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'populaces'' or 'populace's'?
Suggestion: populaces'; populace's
...butes to the general improvement of the populaces wellbeing. Firstly, the first advantage...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...of serious diseases: cancer, coronavirus,... which are lethal issues, conducting q...
^^
Line 4, column 543, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y acceptable amounts of specific toxic. The authorities could invest more in new-en...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62686567164 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01067381624 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64552238806 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0742186881 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289666787604 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078578273113 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796137119027 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162683585369 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077584462753 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.