As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom
The penetration of computers in education sectors affects how the system works. Schools have begun to shift from traditional to more computer-dependent approaches in delivering the study. This change, at least, has triggered a question on the role of teachers in the classroom. When computers are fully introduced in the classroom, many are wondering whether the role of teachers will vanish. This essay will attempt to impart the facts on a teacher’s function.
To begin with, the computers’ role could not be more important today in the classroom. Their escalating role has been perceived as they offer unprecedented ease to students in terms of, but not limited to, material search and translation purposes. For example, students, two decades ago, could not study well without their dictionary and heavy books in their backpacks, while in contrast, nowadays, they only need to open a computer and connect to Wi-Fi to accommodate those academic needs.
Moreover, despite the computers’ role increase in the classroom, it is, however, undeniable that teachers remain a pivotal role in the learning process. They have, from the beginning to date, served as a core of knowledge delivering materials to students. According to previous studies, students prefer to attend a face-to-face study with teachers which is admitted allowing more flexibility for students through intense and dual-direction communication. In addition, this communication is deemed to support the learning process by raising the probability of students grasping knowledge and understanding more conveniently, which cannot be reaped without the presence of teachers at the school.
To sum up, computers are, no doubt, significant and helpful for the study process, bearing in mind the initial creation’s goal; facilitating human activities. Notwithstanding, to date, this technology cannot demonstrate communication capacity to help students ace in their class. Therefore, this fact has successfully broken the experts’ prediction by stressing that teachers are irreplaceable figures in the classroom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 75 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | lee giang | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | Sukhpreet singh 321 | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | ulligadda sreeja | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | minhhuy1000 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 80
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, in addition, in contrast, no doubt, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6858974359 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24629333965 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9211572898 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.266666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352565030204 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111045988622 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885355296413 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195586943835 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700036619902 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.