Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language.
Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
People have cooperated more and more in various fields in recent years, so the need for an efficient type of communication has consistently been a topic of interest. Many scientists suppose that humans could communicate in the same language. This essay will look at both the pros and cons of this trend and demonstrate why it would not be a good improvement.
On the one hand, it will be easier for people to study and work globally if speaking a unified language. For example, instead of translating all information from a book or research into other languages, the difference between languages would be unconcerned while humanity had the same language system. Furthermore, this will help people reduce much time for translating, and people can comfortably connect with other people worldwide. Compared with discriminated languages, same-language use seems to be better for promoting globalization and long-term cooperation.
On the other hand, I would believe that using the same languages can raise some controversial issues in society which outweigh the aforementioned benefits. At first, while using the same language, cultural diversity could be destroyed. As consequences, many regions would be lost their national identity, and the world would be monotonous. Secondly, developing a unified language, in fact, required a lot of money and time. Thus, the government should use this budget to solve other serious problems such as global warming, climate change, or starvation.
To conclude, international language may be a good idea; however, it wastes many resources and workforce, which is more essential for dealing with other crucial problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | hieutrungpham7201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | miminguyen | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 89
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 33
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries Explain the main causes and effects of this problem and suggest some possible solutions 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43410852713 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07255569872 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631782945736 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1097931282 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.846153846 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153389242456 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595146551499 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423627876546 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892354305517 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419913667285 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.