Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
In this day and age, the question of whether food importation from separate places on the global brings benefits or drawback to the countries’ evolution hitherto has been raising public attention. While many people lament that it is not necessary to import food, I agree with the opposite statement.
We can easily recognize that there are huge benefits of buying international foods. First, we can found a variety of food in many parts of region, which makes countries’ food market become more interesting, appealing to foreign visitors. This will also make a development of the economy by creating more income from tourists, comparing with those nations which depend on interior agricultural, the variety of food sources make importing countries higher advantages of all aspects in economic field. Furthermore, building relationships with the Super-power is one more reasons why many countries prevailing focus on importing external foods. The importation will create a chance to keep in contact with Super-power authorities, which means we have a big advocator for us in the global market and also develop our living standards.
Besides aforementioned advantages, there is one big danger of importing foods. It is conspicuous that depending completely on others’ economic can put our countries in the danger of becoming backyard. A historic example was the American Latin, which became American’s backyard after several times received external budget. Therefore, The government should create a reasonable foreign policy to gain the initiative in developing countries.
In conclusion, importing food can bring us an enormous benefit if we can ultilise it completely
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-01 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | RkmsU | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 50
- Sample topic Children who start reading earlier in life perform better later on in their school studies How important are early reading skills in a child s academic performance What other preschool factors influence a child s later academic achievements 78
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 87
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...tive development? In this day and age, the question of whether food importation from separate places o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... We can easily recognize that there are huge benefits of buying international fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53454545455 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02878749981 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1626646266 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414771180645 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159025162419 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190290066306 0.0667982634062 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318320399737 0.151304729494 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.347867232202 0.056905535591 611% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...tive development? In this day and age, the question of whether food importation from separate places o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... We can easily recognize that there are huge benefits of buying international fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53454545455 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02878749981 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1626646266 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414771180645 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159025162419 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190290066306 0.0667982634062 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318320399737 0.151304729494 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.347867232202 0.056905535591 611% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.