Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
The given statement tells us technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. The given statement is highly subjective, polemical, and uses loaded words which compromise the effectiveness of the sentiment expressed. The statement defeats logic and comes across as nothing more than an obvious generalization where words have been used inadequately and indefinitely. I disagree with this statement.
Technology has brought revolutionary changes to our life. Advancement in technology has solved many complicated problems in our life. There is no dearth of medical provisions to cure deadly diseases. Be it online shopping, online food delivery everything is possible with just one click. The Internet has changed the world drastically. We can garner as much knowledge as we want from the content available online. There is no need to do household chores manually. From washing machine to dishwashing is possible with help of machines. Thus, we can say that technology has only simplified our lives rather than making them complicated.
As every coin has two sides. Technology has also its cons. Indiscriminate use of too much technology will exacerbate things. Too much reliance on digital things will eradicate the habit of doing things manually. We will be entirely dependent on machines to do our daily life chores. Technology will eradicate creative thinking and will make us feel handicapped. Nowadays, we have a car, etc. as transport medium too much use of the vehicle as transport medium will result in spreading of pollution. Pollution will deteriorate the environment which can cater the earthquakes, landslides, etc. If technology interferes with the environment, it will result in detrimental consequences. Thus, our life can be endangered and our survival will become complicated.
Further, it can be argued that technology only makes our lives complicated, it will be wrong to utter. Technology has its own pros and cons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-13 | Aamena Afreen | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Shubhan Mital | 79 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | wiloj50 | view | |
| 2022-10-02 | nidhi78 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 33
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum quot Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our s 58
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fectiveness of the sentiment expressed. The statement defeats logic and comes acros...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rather than making them complicated. As every coin has two sides. Technology ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45307443366 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09118244844 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 23.0359550562 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0656685661 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.8076923077 118.986275619 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8846153846 23.4991977007 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.42307692308 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.83258426966 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341505535107 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841133117567 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13897678976 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222880122112 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711643000878 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 48.8420337079 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.44 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.2143820225 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.