Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In today's world, the idea that the elderly, regardless of age, may continue to work if they wish has gained traction and grown popular in various countries. Nevertheless, every story has its two sides and this topic is no exception. From my point of view, I believe that this growing trend is far more detrimental than beneficial for the following reasons.
On the one hand, there are numerous explanations why old citizens are permitted to work at any age. Older workers are regarded as valuable expertise and professional employees in a company. They may make a significant contribution to the smooth functioning of projects and play an essential part in a company's or organization's increased profits. Furthermore, when an elderly person works, they have a better chance of having a stable income, and they are more likely to be able to maintain themselves. By doing so, the elderly may become less reliant on their own children. They may be able to purchase something that they desire, even in difficult circumstances and they may be able to financially assist their children and relatives. In the UK, 70% of old residents are still working like the youth and most of them are very enjoy it because of not depending on their adolescents about financial and other complex issues.
On the other hand, there has been a rise in sophisticated technology and change in a variety of industries in general. It is predicted that the present tasks would demand labor forces with language abilities, innovation, technological capability, and most importantly, rapid modification and integration to new changes and environments. All of the conditions associated are more noticeable in younger laborers. If the retirement age for the elderly is extended, younger individuals with more creative and high-tech ideas may miss out on worldwide opportunities to show their talents and contribute to their communities. According to the USA survey, 90% of elderly are not agreed about keep working in their age due to the creativity of youngsters these days are so phenomenal so they want them to develop and demonstrate their talent to worldwide. Furthermore, the trend may lead to an increase in unemployment rates, which would be disastrous to a country's economic and social stability.
To conclude, the ability of elderly people to work endlessly does not appear to be helpful to social development. As a result, the government should think about balancing the number of workers in various age groups and establishing the appropriate retirement age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Technology is responsible for unemployment To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph illustrates population trends globally by percentage from 1950 to 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...ration to new changes and environments. All of the conditions associated are more noticeab...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, in general, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16949152542 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0501882527 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583535108959 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6195052888 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.611111111 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183939274228 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499735390264 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492481030618 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102585577375 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357552993687 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.