As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom.
It is undeniable that computers have become an indispensable part in our everyday life, especially in the field of education. As the use of computers is becoming increasingly widespread, many people believe that the roles of teachers are less important than before. I will discuss both views in my following essay.
On one hand, technology can be such a powerful tool for illustrating the lessons, therefore capturing students’ attention and creating a more engaged learning environment. Moreover, technology can effectively serve students’ need. Because each student has a different intellectual ability, technology can allow them to study at their own pace and their own style. This can create a relaxing attitude, which can boost students’ concentration and conduce a better grasping of knowledge. At a higher educational level, the availability of digital books, simulator and other academic materials can provide students with an ever accessible source of information, which otherwise would not be at hand.
However, the roles of teachers in the classrooms should not be seen as peripheral. First of all, teachers can provide social interaction and meaningful moral lessons to students. They can also equip students with important skills such as group skills, negotiation skills, problem-solving skills. Secondly, an experienced teacher can acknowledge students’ deficiencies by repeating their explanation, giving extra exercises or suggesting useful learning materials. Teachers also give students much passion and inspire them to be lifelong learners. These roles can hardly be mimicked by a computer, no matter how sophisticated the software is.
To conclude, computers can support students’ learning progress, while teachers help them identify their mistakes, give them useful advice and lead them through their study path. For this reasons, no computers can ever compromise or threaten the roles of the teacher in the classroom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-28 | Blueberry123 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | SKN | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-20 | rahulchd | 89 | view |
| 2021-03-20 | wisdompath | 84 | view |
- Write a paragraph about family rules 76
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree disagree 73
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 78
- Many people believe that students in remote areas should be given bonus points in the national graduation exam Others believe that no one should be given that advantage Discuss both points and give your opinion 95
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to progress'
Suggestion: to progress
...omputers can support students’ learning progress, while teachers help them identify thei...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...lead them through their study path. For this reasons, no computers can ever compromi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69520547945 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11688804523 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633561643836 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6831185213 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259562716044 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895325309514 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853255046112 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150067940151 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422552128428 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.