The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph shows the combined time spent in billions of minutes, on three different kinds of phone call in the United Kingdom, from 1995-2002.
Overall, local calls were the most popular over the whole period, with national and international calls and calls on mobiles second and third respectively. However, the number of minutes spent on international and national calls and mobiles both increased over the period; with mobile minutes increasing dramatically, thus narrowing the gap between the three categories by 2002.
Minutes spent on local calls fluctuated over the time period, with just over 70 billion minutes in 1995, peaking at approximately 90 billion in 1999 and then steadily decreasing to just over 70 billion minutes in 2002.
National and international calls increased steadily year on year, from just under 40 billion minutes in 1995 to a peak of just over 60 billion in 2002. Mobile minutes increased at a very rapid pace from approximately 3 billion in 1995 to around 45 billion in 2002. Mobile phone usage nearly doubled from approximately 22 billion minutes in 2000 to 40 billion in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | dkhnh_2603 | view | |
| 2022-06-22 | dkhnh_2603 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | chi150901 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- H
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the United Kingdom, from 1995-2002. Overall, local calls were the most popul...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o just over 70 billion minutes in 2002. National and international calls increas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, then, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14207650273 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7648545271 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48087431694 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3834351911 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242836488769 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140031656218 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378192245019 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166637348232 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303490570663 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.