Increased world demands for oil and gas have made it necessary to look for these sources of energy in remote, untouched natural places. Do you think the advantages of locating new sources of energy outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such places?
The fast dwindling of the world’s coal reserves have prompted modern people to seek alternative sources of energy in pristine environments. Many people, however, pondered on whether this practice could cause more harm than good. Personally, I am completely against it.
On the one hand, it is true that the inefficiency of renewables has induced mankind to search for resources in uncharted areas. Admittedly, fossil fuel is the perpetrator of air pollution, climate change and oil spills that heavily spoiled the environment humans are living in. Renewable energies such as nuclear, therefore, is undoubtedly a good option to substitute fossil fuel due to its abundance and environmental-friendliness. However, nuclear energy is highly dangerous and could lead to a catastrophe should the power be not properly contained. The accident of Chernobyl nuclear power plant, whose surroundings remain inhabitable for several decades, perfectly exemplifies this argument.
On the other hand, the exploitation of humans would exert a devastating effect on the environment that is often home to many wildlife species. Normally, resources deposited deeply under the earth surface require heavy machinery to explore and extract, emitting a significant amount of greenhouse gas and noise. In fact, numerous species have been on the edge of extinction since they have lost their homes to this kind of human activity. Moreover, greater exploitation incites greater consumption of energy, which also means that the environment will be more polluted due to the exhaust emissions released from traffic and industrial activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | nguyenanhanhanh | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals to medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both view and give your opinion 56
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals to medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- Increased world demands for oil and gas have made it necessary to look for these sources of energy in remote untouched natural places Do you think the advantages of locating new sources of energy outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such places 56
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult Others believe that it as getting easier Discuss both views and give your own opinion 11
- An increasing number of advertisements on TV aim at children What are the effects of television advertising on children Should television advertising be controlled 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in fact, kind of, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63524590164 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23784757934 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69262295082 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4703651139 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113015711044 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355983962556 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039341719921 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714060665254 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312013350656 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.