Many people believe that cities should not try to preserve its old historic buildings and instead, they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings.
To what extent do you agree?
City historic structures are suggested not to be preserved but to be superseded with cutting-edge constructions instead. I totally disagree with this sentiment since the old historical sites foster a sense of patriotism and bring prosperity to the economy.
The reservation of such buildings is firstly essential to reinforce citizens, especially the youth, with a strong feeling of patriotism. Cultural relics are part of history reflecting the associated events when forefathers and ancestors of a nation sacrificed themselves for its survival and growth. These forms of living history, such as museums or cultural heritage, can give the young generations the inherent value of peace and arouse a spirit of national identity. Take the Atomic Bomb Dome in Hiroshima, Japan for example, this historic site is a remainder of war calamity and it has been encouraging generations to work diligently for their country’s contribution.
Not only can historical constructions serve as a bridge between the past and the present, they can also result in mass tourism. As those places are often exclusive and informative, they are more likely to become captivating tourist attractions. Representing a tangible evidence for hope and peace, the Atomic Bomb Dome appeals hundreds of thousands of visitors every year while it has no exceptional appearance as compared to modern buildings. Historical destinations can therefore generate an enormous amount of revenue for a country and also boost correlated service industries such as hotels and banking. It is an irrefutable fact that a country would thrive well on such old-fashion yet unique buildings.
In conclusion, I firmly believe preserving historic sites is vital to patriotism promotion and economic prosperity Crystal-clear policies should be established and enacted for the protection of those important buildings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2021-09-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
- Topic Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram below shows the process of making cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to 3 different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rotection of those important buildings.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58098591549 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16795561353 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640845070423 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5067535609 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140750973092 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473892067932 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389419074835 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882083185461 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370067713772 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.