The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfont area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The map illustrates the advancement of a town named Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
In general, the town underwent a number of drastic transformations, the most important of which was the replacment of two industrial areas by residential and recreation amenties.
In 2009, there were only three residential buildings in the middle of this town. However, in 2014, three new residential buildings were erected as well as a brand new university in the southwest of the town was built. To the south of Darwin town, the vast area was the industrial zone which was altered significantly in 2014 with the opening of a footpath leading to the newly constructed habour by the sea and the appearance of various trees being planted along the footpath.
To the north of residential zone, a slight change was witnessed. A considerable modification in this area was that the industrial area inside the footpath was replaced by a small swimming pool in 2014. By contrast, a school, convention center and two large swimming pools near the sea remained their positions as they used to be throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 67
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 67
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98232523178 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3269542451 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194265893822 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101103052767 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960538523384 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153532192361 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111799945588 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.