Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this day and age, an increasing number of people are concerned about developing methods of food production and preparation, such as convenience foods. I completely disagree with the idea that original cooking methods will be replaced by this advance soon due to people's awareness and increasing well-being consciousness.
First, it goes without saying that people, with the help of many publications and constant awareness campaigns, started transforming themselves with healthy lifestyles. Take the Internet as a prime example, people often notice on many social media platforms about individuals with tremendous weight loss and completely get transformed. Eventually, they inspire others who wanted to begin their weight loss journeys. In addition, spirituality has been accelerating among the youth, which encourages consuming fresh and raw vegetables and fruits. All these pieces of evidence, therefore, are for constructive progress and they indicate that canned food is irreplaceable.
That is not to say that the trend of consuming processed food is not going to flourish in the coming years. Family size nowadays has reduced to nuclear or single-parent family, which means that adult members are busy in addressing the family challenges. As a consequence, spending time on old methodology to prepare food, which is extravagantly time-consuming, is considered as futile and less significant. Nevertheless, people gradually realize that ready-made meal is actually ruining their health, since canned and frozen foods are added high volumes of chemicals to get the food preserved for longer, which has adverse effects on fitness.
In conclusion, I would argue that people know what is healthy and beneficial for them even though there will be a lot of fast foods produced more and more.Only by doing so, can traditional food not be replaced by convenience food.
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total sales in North America South America Europe and Asia 67
- The illustration shows information about how igloo is build from snow 84
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 59
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 67
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, an increasing numbe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d increasing well-being consciousness. First, it goes without saying that peopl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate that canned food is irreplaceable. That is not to say that the trend of con...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which has adverse effects on fitness. In conclusion, I would argue that people...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Only
...ot of fast foods produced more and more.Only by doing so, can traditional food not b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52613240418 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08742654148 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648083623693 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2578669788 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312145156347 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920664959645 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869545896334 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187692253278 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908228852194 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.