As country develops, a large population chooses to live individually or live in a small family unit. Discuss the causes and its effects on society.
Along with the development of a nation, a considerable amount of citizens opt for residing individually or in small groups. This essay will indicate some explanations for this phenomenon with its impact on the community.
From my perspective, the roots of this development can be attributed to two principal reasons. Initially, a large population chooses to live individually or live in a small family unit in order to cut down on the costs of living. For instance, in the past, there was only one breadwinner in charge of earning money in an extended family, which often resulted in an overwhelming financial burden. Individuals who currently live on their own or in a small family unit can more easily satisfy their own and others’ demands with their wages. Avoiding conflicts between family members is another main explanation. As the size of a family and the number of people in the family minimalize, so do the potential arguments and rivalries between members of the family.
This trend has both positive and negative impacts on the community. In terms of merit, it might be a driving force behind national economic development. This is derived from the fact that the amount of money made by an individual now may be used to support fewer people compared to the past, leading to higher GDP, which is an indispensable criterion to evaluate the development of an economy. By contrast, on account of living apart from families and relatives, this trend can act as a deterrent to the sustainability of the family bond. Some people, especially youngsters, would not be embraced in the love of their families, therefore they might suffer from loneliness or mental disorders. Recent research conducted in Japan on young people living individually indicated that approximately 17% of them felt lonely, and a negligible of 2% even thought of committing suicide.
In conclusion, decreasing the living costs and staying away from family arguments suggests why a considerable amount of citizens opt for residing individually or in small groups, and this phenomenon has both constructive and adverse effects on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-29 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
- The influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity What are the primary causes of the loss of biodiversity What solutions can you suggest 89
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 84
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16811594203 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01440356613 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5626735703 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277559607082 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089320048427 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113960096647 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161962084125 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076538618502 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.