Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and usage upwards fuel resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is believed by few individuals that travelling via air need to limited as it leads to severe pollution and consume global fuel resources.I totally disagree with this aforementioned statement and I will elaborate it in the upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, restricting air travel would not help to stop pollution completely as it is not the only source of pollution.because, in contemporary era, there are many other means of transport which are also equally responsible for air pollution such as cars, trucks, buses and so on. These modes of transport also emit harmful gases which increase air pollution. Consequently, it is not good to restricting air travel because other road vehicles are also equally responsible for air pollution and noise pollution.
On the other side, air travel is a fastest and easiest method to reach in foreign countries. Apart from that, if restricting air travel it also affect to the aviation industry such as an employment, because many workers lose their jobs. Moreover, air travel is also a source of income for countries. Apart from that, air travel is more beneficial for hotel industries and tourism industries, because it through this, many individuals get new jobs opportunity as well as income. Furthermore, even it help political relationship and business relationship. So, air travel is more significant method of travel.
To recapitulate, few people favourite restriction of air travel to reduce the consumption of fuel resources and level of pollution. I strongly oppose this view as it would increase unemployment and affect the political as well as a business relationship however, reducing the number of slides and developing air craft engines and consume less fuel and produce more energy could play a significant role to save fuel and address the problem of pollution.
- The plans below show a public when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 67
- The diagram shows the process of recycling the plastics 80
- The charts below show the percentage of five kind of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 67
- In many countries tradition food are being replaced by international fast food this is having a negative effect on both families and societies to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Line chart shows the average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in US from 2000 to 2011 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...ution and consume global fuel resources.I totally disagree with this aforemention...
^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'restrict'?
Suggestion: restrict
...lution. Consequently, it is not good to restricting air travel because other road vehicles ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...that, if restricting air travel it also affect to the aviation industry such as an emp...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...as well as income. Furthermore, even it help political relationship and business rel...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is more significant method of travel. To recapitulate, few people favourite re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26962457338 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08673213822 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.4170684658 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238178202992 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101975050752 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591511962917 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148716455461 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00311360810499 0.056905535591 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.