Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, International tourism is one of the most popular and biggest sectors in the world. While some say that international tourism creates more stress than understanding between people and cultures, others do not agree. In this essay, I will explain both aspects of the statement and why I disagree with the former view.
There are a number of reasons available for people who think that it creates misunderstanding. Firstly, when people from other nations visit a site in another country, it will create a language barrier for them, this may result in crimes and frauds to them. So, they demotivate others who plan to visit this site, resulting the misunderstanding will create to many people about cultures. For example, the rate of crime to foreign people increased by 20% in one year in Nepal, which lead many visitors to cancel their trips due to some offenders. Hence, the more bad things happened to people in the place, the more they talk about their experiences to others.
On the other hand, others and I, however, believe that if people visit more attractions in other regions, they will learn about their cultural activities, this may lead them to learn another language. So they understand values in a better way about historical events. For instance, a survey by the University of Yale has shown that participants who travelled to different nations, learnt faster about other religions, languages, many foods making processes better than any other sources. Therefore, the more people travel, the more they learn.
In conclusion, although International travelling brings many crimes and frauds as its disadvantages, people learn many useful things about a particular country. In my words, despite having many demerits of travelling to another nation, its advantages are more beneficial for visitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | 2xhptaljahy | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-27 | nhattram39 | 89 | view |
- The increased world demand for oil and gas has made it remote to untouched natural areas Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging these natural areas 56
- The increased world demand for oil and gas has made it necessary for locating these sources in remote and untouched natural areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging these natural areas 56
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country to what extent do you agree of disagree 73
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2457337884 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.803762056 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6269254556 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.785714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17602659758 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732732254373 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775340161368 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133989586327 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127106007158 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.