Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There are some opinions that smart dressing is something that many employees should have, whereas others believe that work efficiency is more essential than appearance. This essay will examine both discussions in greater detail.
On the one hand, company staff dress elegantly and that will bring them several benefits. Firstly, good appearance will have a strong impression on their customers. For instance, some people opine that the employees who wear suits or shirts at the workplace seem to be more professional and trustworthy than those who dress casually. In addition, they can create a good image and that is advantageous for them to compete with rival companies. Thus, the consumers are attracted more easily by these organisations than those without the uniform dress of the employees. Obviously, outfit influences the decisions of customers. As a result, many companies encourage their staff, especially the sellers, to dress more elegantly.
On the other hand, even though appearance will bring companies certain benefits, high productivity is the core factor for the growth of every organisation. A skillful employee can do the jobs and solve the problems efficiently and the directors also do not need to train their workers, which wastes too much time and spends a huge amount of money in their budget. Many organisations nowadays tend to hire experienced workers and they understand that increasing productivity will lead to better profits. It is undeniable that working efficiency contributes greatly to the development of the companies.
From my point of view, employees should not only dress appropriately but also focus on improving their working performance. However, the quality of work needs to be prioritised in the companies.
In conclusion, both appearance and quality of work bring the organisations various advantages. But productivity is more essential because of its greater profits, which sustains one's business.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 89
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 82
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly to the development of the companies. From my point of view, employees should ...
^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... of its greater profits, which sustains ones business.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48837209302 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96740421887 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0970662959 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1764705882 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202041108522 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622622348616 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541603268814 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125108055144 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465709931211 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.