Education for young people is important in many countries. However, some people think that the government should spend more money on education in adult populations who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, education among youngsters is very important in most of all countries. Some believe that the authority needs to spend more money on education in adults who do not how to write and read, while others disagree with this argue. In this essay, I will explain both sides of the view and why I disagree with the statement.
To embarks with, when the ruling party spend more money on education for the older generation, it will create many obstacles for providing employments to these people. This may also lead young generations to have difficulty in getting a job. A survey, for instance, has shown that nearly 80% of adults who started learning after 25 years, those people replaced younger ones in labor works by 79% in China. Hence, the more people learn, the more jobs will require.
On the other hand, if the governing party spend lots of money on older generations for their education, it will help to reduce poverty, diseases and many more, leading to more work forces will ready in a nation. This may result in the economy in the long run. For example, the government of India launched many educational and training programs for elder people in 2014. Since there the rate of poverty decreased and the economic benefits inclined. Therefore, the more people learn how to read and write, the most of them come out from the line of poverty.
In conclusion, although it will help to reduce poverty and work forces was increased. In my words, despite having many benefits, this development has many demerits. It will create many problems for people as well as the government in the future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-18 | kanonchan | 67 | view |
2021-10-13 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
2020-06-05 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
2020-06-05 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
2020-03-07 | Ngaannie | 80 | view |
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 73
- The chart show fresh fruit exports in 2010 67
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by di erent sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 73
- Some countries pay extremely high salaries to people Some people believe that country must not do that and make a limit for salaries Do you agree or disagree 83
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81884057971 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45102201677 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3335294113 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344891758953 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106964965786 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088828630611 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209005502879 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544327809724 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.