In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the internet plays a major role in communication, shopping, and many more in the life of human beings. Using it in various ways, while it reduces the chances of having face to face interactions among humans. In this essay, I will explain both positives and negatives of the internet and why I think its advantages are superior.
To embarks with, since the usage of the internet increased, people tend to have a less live conversation with their close ones and use for different reasons, which will make them lazier. This may lead them to fewer exercise and physical activities in daily routines, resulting in having more heart-related problems in the long run. For instance, research by the University of Yale has shown that there was 98% of citizens become 79% lazier than in the past since the Internet introduced in the USA. The more people use the internet, the more they have chances to have heart-related illnesses.
On the other hand, if we use more internet, it will save a lot of time and money. People can buy anything without requiring more physical work. This may lead them toward having a longer life expectancy. For example, the average rate of life expectancy rose to 90 years when the internet took place in Japanese people lifestyle in 2009. Therefore, the more people relied on the internet, the more they live.
In conclusion, although the internet will increase the life expectancy of humans, they become lazier. In my words, having a number of demerits of the Internet in human beings, their benefits is beneficial for all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-18 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that globalisation will eventually lead to a loss of cultural identity What are your views on this 67
- Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 46
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90188679245 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64114822328 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4394941608 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177136195172 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627241817115 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468050510809 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105650389395 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394852828968 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.