The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The change in enquiries number in three different sources in the Tourist Information Office located in a city from January to June in 2011 is displayed in the line graph.
Overall, it is noticeable that most figures showed a growth, except the letter or email. Furthermore, the highest quantity of questions was noted in person.
Initially, the asks received had been observed the biggest by telephone, with almost a thousand. When it came to the written questions, the number of those had been greater at closely 800 than that of individual ones at around a half of the former's numbers.
Eventually, the figure for personal enquiries inclined dramatically to exceed 1,800, breaking the record to be the leader, followed by phone ones experiencing this upward trend also, increasing to 1,600 calls. This contrasted to those witnessing an incline, that for either email or letter decrease twofold, being below 400 asks, and as the lowest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-04 | brew | 65 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | euphorianmt | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | leuleu28 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 78
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 61
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 84
- Without capital punishment the death penalty our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'formers'' or 'former's'?
Suggestion: formers'; former's
...individual ones at around a half of the formers numbers. Eventually, the figure for pe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11038961039 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72579582769 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701298701299 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2798874269 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213442811542 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768746818981 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972828726893 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117465349006 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112602801196 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.