The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the changes of five age groups of Iceland over a period of 30 years, starting from 1990.
In general, it is transparent that the percentage of people aged 25 to 54 years old was higher than any other age groups’, and had an upward trend in the given period. However, the number of young Icelanders under 24 tended to decrease over the years.
As can be seen from the chart, in 1990, there was over 30% of people aged 25 to 54 in Iceland. This percentage steadily increased over the next 20 years and reached its peak in 2020, with the ratio of nearly a half. Not following the same trend, the young under 24 years old saw a downward trend over time. Starting from roughly 21% and 25% in 1990, the number of young people of 15 to 24 age group and under 14 age group fell into approximately 9% and 19% respectively.
On the other hand, the number of elderly people in Iceland witnessed a marginal fluctuation. People aged 55 to 64 years accounted for nearly 13% in 1990 and slightly decreased to 12% in 2000 and 2010, and finally reached one-tenth in 2020. In the years 1990 and 2000, the percentage of elderly people over 65 years old remained stable at 12%. Nonetheless, this figure went up minimally in 2010 and then fell down in the last year with the figure of 13%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-02 | mary.ssherr | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | mary.ssherr | view |
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 67
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 78
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different are of the UK between 2001 and 2011 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, nonetheless, then, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42738589212 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4098276201 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547717842324 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5905838976 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100494849843 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457966143286 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312499523177 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728651246425 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130677372547 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.