The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table demonstrates the figures in various categories of families throughout a 36-year period in a specific country. Data of the household types will be described throughout the essay on average between 1984 and 2020.
From an overall perspective, two major classifications can be detected such as people who decide to live alone and families. Individuals who inhabit without a companion tend to increase, albeit slowly, the data belong to them has always been the lowest approximately 11%, in comparison with others. It might be indicated that the majority of the children in Canada live dependently with their families. Conversely, the percentage of adolescents who relied on their parents has been sharply decreasing from 52% in 1986 to 36% in 2020. The ratio of married individuals who are unlikely to have children shows a gradual rise with an increase of roughly 6%. Additionally, the proportion of independent young people slightly fluctuated and then, reached a plateau in the last decade of the table (9%). The percentage of lone parents marginally climbed from 4% to 12%, despite the initial rise, the figures remained stable in the last six years.
Overall, fewer children are inclined to live under parental supervision, also, a greater number of individuals have no children or choose to be the lone parent respectively over the last 36 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-11 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | dhananjaydeej | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | _phdiep | 90 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- The graphs above show the types of gifts that men and women in the USA buy for each other on Valentine s Day 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95427970833 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5383951896 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100570836373 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417786758643 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375566222309 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662648250868 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501283434854 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.