Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development ?
In recent days, the advertising field has been growing at a rapid pace and becoming ubiquitous in daily life. From my perspective, I believe that this phenomenon has an adverse bearing on society for three main reasons below
First of all, the mass coverage of advertisements is a real nuisance. As the advent of the technological field has been a push for the marketing field, advertisements now appear in a variety of forms: commercial break, pops-up on website,s and others, which interrupt our experiences on online platforms. Hence, people need to click the close button instantly or pay for ad-free content at high prices.
The second reason is that the content of many advertisements may take advantage of false information to trick people into buying unnecessary things. For example, there are a host of health newspapers and blogs that are subtly advertising their products. These newspapers can be in name of creditable sources with catching articles and cause misinformation among their readers. Therefore, we should take caution when acquiring information from the Internet.
Last but not least, the ubiquity of advertising can take on toll on nature. Exposure to advertising with increasing frequency may encourage people to buy on impulses which lead to wastage. Apart from vast footprints from the manufacturing process, these products also cause pollutions when disposed into the environment. Hence, excessive consumption for reasons like keeping with the latest fashion can result in disaster in the foreseen future.
In conclusion, the development of advertising has negative influences on society and the environment as well. For that reason, actions should be taken to diminish the repercussions of this phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...ms: commercial break, pops-up on website,s and others, which interrupt our experie...
^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...essary things. For example, there are a host of health newspapers and blogs that are...
^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cquiring information from the Internet. Last but not least, the ubiquity of adve...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43542435424 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06301514706 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627306273063 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1741572408 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106648905851 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403950891486 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536085467738 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651941653397 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318842461795 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.