Children are suggested to study from Televisions. However, some people agree that other sources can be the best media for them to learn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
At present, television programs are considered as reliable resources for kids to study, while some believe that other media fit them best. This essay will discuss that television programs are advantageous for their variety of options, while e-books have an advantage in terms of portability. I deeply believe that the later one is the best.
To begin, children are advised to gain some learning experience through television programs because they possess a variety of educational contents namely endangered plants and animal programs. This means that children may learn to grow their knowledge on those creature by seeing them on tv, resulting in the understanding to nurture natural habitat. Taking Canada as an example, the country has promoted pupils to study from tv programs containing ideas of protecting flora and fauna, leading to cut-off in the animal poaching over years. It is obvious that television is an informative resource with options to build awareness towards environment.
On the other hand, some consider that there is a better choices for student such as e-books which are portable to use. The students can carry the e-books anywhere for it's virtual format, leading to higher courage to study. For instance, students who hold the virtual-format one are more frequently study than those who watch televisions as learning tools.
To conclude, while television channels are full of educational contents, e-books are better because they are particularly handy to be carried as learning resources for children. In my opinion, e-books are better learning choice for students as they provides handiness and encourage student to learn.
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 61
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 78
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 84
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this creature' or 'those creatures'?
Suggestion: this creature; those creatures
...en may learn to grow their knowledge on those creature by seeing them on tv, resulting in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ature by seeing them on tv, resulting in the understanding to nurture natural hab...
^^
Line 2, column 651, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to build awareness towards environment. On the other hand, some consider that th...
^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...er learning choice for students as they provides handiness and encourage student to lear...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38223938224 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76185138622 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598455598456 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.147867829 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257057544941 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903728765166 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044778252348 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148389729818 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217579465695 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.