The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table demonstrates the figures in various categories of families throughout a 36-year period in a specific country. Descriptions of the household types will be given throughout the essay on average between 1984 and 2020.
From an overall perspective, two major classifications can be detected such as people who decide to live alone and families. Even though the number of individuals who inhabit without a companion tends to increase, albeit slowly, the data belonging to them has always been the lowest approximately 11%, in comparison with others. It might be indicated that the majority of the children in Canada live dependently with their families since 1984. Conversely, the percentage of adolescents who relied on their parents has been sharply decreasing from 52% in 1986 to 36% in 2020. The ratio of married individuals who are unlikely to have children shows a gradual rise with an increase of roughly 6%. Additionally, the proportion of independent young people slightly fluctuated and then, reached a plateau in the last decade of the table (9%). The percentage of lone parents marginally climbed from 4% to 12%, despite the initial rise, the figures remained stable in the last six years as the ones without any children.
Overall, fewer children are inclined to live under parental supervision, also, a greater number of individuals have no children or choose to be the lone parent respectively over the last 36 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-11 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | dhananjaydeej | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | _phdiep | 90 | view |
- A common opinion is that art experts are paid considerably low and an appropriate solution might be acquiring salary from the authorities I support this view to some extent and the details about government funding will be given throughout the essay Firstl 84
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18884120172 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93888958056 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618025751073 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8856901951 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.9 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104437977982 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443773227806 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383277280643 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687538966778 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508091402083 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.