The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems?
The boundary between wealthy individuals and those living in poverty is gradually extended due to the fact that the rich become wealthier and the poor are dragged down in poverty day by day. This discrepancy could instigate a range of problems, which need to be tackled as soon as possible by organizations and governments.
The giant gulf between prosperous and destitute communities could easily lead to social inequality and instability in every corner of the world. It is obvious that difference will cause discrimination in many aspects of life, from interactions among people to the rights they have in society. Accordingly, children born in impoverished families can hardly build-up and have long-term relationships with those born in well-off families. Later in life, when these poor children grow up, at school and workplace, they might not have access to some facilities and be treated equally as their rich counterparts because of lack of money. The burden of social inequality will force a group of poor people committing to various dangerous crimes such as robbery or murder to ease their craving for money. For example, in the 90s, in the whole globe, the gap between rich and poor was significantly huge, resulting in the rapid increase of street robbers and household thieves.
Having been aware of these damaging consequences, organizations and government should take the main responsibility of mitigating the discrepancy among prosperous and destitute communities. Each organization should apply obligations supporting the poor in their work as well as encouraging the rich to take good account of their colleagues. Meanwhile, all governments should implement policies to help the poor and to restrict the power of the rich in society such as financial concessions for those in difficulty and tariff more on companies which create a remarkable amount of money. In Vietnam, the government also applies tuition fees and university admissions privileges for impoverished students in remote regions.
In conclusion, the deep gulf dividing the rich and the poor will be the root of myriads of social issues which can largely be addressed by serious actions taken by the governments and organizations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | NUT | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 67
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'can'.
Suggestion: hardly can
... children born in impoverished families can hardly build-up and have long-term relationshi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...ccess to some facilities and be treated equally as their rich counterparts because of lack...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n by the governments and organizations.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34571428571 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04339901278 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574285714286 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.3502828805 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.923076923 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228516514244 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718004894662 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469386036501 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127562611948 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401921227174 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.